Triple
T14262397
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | NL-WE |
E353553
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasNotationFormat |
P107278
|
FINISHED |
| Object | alpha-numeric |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: alpha-numeric | Statement: [NL-WE, hasNotationFormat, alpha-numeric]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNotationFormat Context triple: [NL-WE, hasNotationFormat, alpha-numeric]
-
A.
usesNotationFor
Indicates that one entity employs or adopts a particular notation system or symbolic representation for another entity.
-
B.
hasObjectNotation
Indicates that an entity is represented or expressed using a specific object-based notation or symbolic format.
-
C.
hasFormatSpecification
chosen
Indicates that something is associated with a particular format definition or specification that describes how it should be structured or represented.
-
D.
hasAlternativeNotation
Indicates that an entity can be represented or written in a different, equivalent form or notation.
-
E.
hasFormatElement
Indicates that one entity includes, is composed of, or is associated with a specific structural or formatting component of its overall format.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8278c43e08190824146f4632b89a5 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de63563fc88190b0abdbf8529c65eb |
completed | April 14, 2026, 3:55 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de2a7d586c8190846ff242bbf5ac53 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:52 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:09 a.m.