Triple
T14258206
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tłı̨chǫ language |
E353438
|
entity |
| Predicate | closelyRelatedTo |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gwichʼin |
E13412
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gwichʼin | Statement: [Tłı̨chǫ language, closelyRelatedTo, Gwichʼin]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gwichʼin Context triple: [Tłı̨chǫ language, closelyRelatedTo, Gwichʼin]
-
A.
Gwich’in
chosen
Gwich’in is an Athabaskan Indigenous language spoken by the Gwich’in people of northern Alaska and northwestern Canada.
-
B.
Stoney Nakoda
Stoney Nakoda is an Indigenous Siouan language spoken by the Stoney Nakoda people primarily in Alberta, Canada.
-
C.
Koyukon Athabaskan
Koyukon Athabaskan is an Athabaskan (Dene) language spoken by the Koyukon people of interior Alaska.
-
D.
Nlaka'pamux
The Nlaka'pamux are an Indigenous First Nations people of the Interior of British Columbia, Canada, whose traditional territory includes the Fraser Canyon region.
-
E.
Blackfoot
The Blackfoot are a Native American people known for their nomadic buffalo-hunting culture, warrior traditions, and historic presence across the northern Great Plains of what is now the United States and Canada.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8278c43e08190824146f4632b89a5 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de6352611c819090d062fe3079cd03 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 3:54 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fd8aa2b7908190831e6c07abcc091d |
completed | May 8, 2026, 7:02 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:09 a.m.