Triple
T14254922
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | United States – Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products |
E353360
|
entity |
| Predicate | followUpProceeding |
P67498
|
FINISHED |
| Object | United States – Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products (Article 21.5 – Malaysia) |
E353360
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States – Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products (Article 21.5 – Malaysia) | Statement: [United States – Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products, followUpProceeding, United States – Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products (Article 21.5 – Malaysia)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States – Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products (Article 21.5 – Malaysia) Context triple: [United States – Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products, followUpProceeding, United States – Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products (Article 21.5 – Malaysia)]
-
A.
United States – Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products
chosen
United States – Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products is a landmark WTO dispute settlement case that clarified the relationship between trade rules and environmental protection, particularly regarding measures to protect endangered sea turtles.
-
B.
United States – Measures Concerning the Importation, Marketing and Sale of Tuna and Tuna Products
United States – Measures Concerning the Importation, Marketing and Sale of Tuna and Tuna Products is a landmark WTO dispute settlement case addressing the compatibility of U.S. “dolphin-safe” tuna labeling requirements with international trade rules.
-
C.
WTO Agreement on Preshipment Inspection
The WTO Agreement on Preshipment Inspection is a World Trade Organization treaty that sets rules and disciplines for the use of preshipment inspection services to verify the quality, quantity, and price of traded goods before export.
-
D.
New York State Shellfish Sanitation Program
The New York State Shellfish Sanitation Program is a regulatory and monitoring initiative that oversees the safety, harvesting, and handling of shellfish in the state’s marine and coastal waters to protect public health.
-
E.
Foreign Shipping Practices Act of 1988
The Foreign Shipping Practices Act of 1988 is a U.S. law that empowers the Federal Maritime Commission to address unfair or discriminatory shipping practices by foreign governments or carriers affecting U.S. oceanborne trade.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: followUpProceeding Context triple: [United States – Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products, followUpProceeding, United States – Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products (Article 21.5 – Malaysia)]
-
A.
followsUp
Indicates that one entity continues, responds to, or builds upon a previous entity, typically as a subsequent action, communication, or step.
-
B.
followUpType
Indicates the specific category or nature of a follow-up action or interaction that occurs after an initial event or communication.
-
C.
followUpMechanism
Indicates a mechanism or process that is used to continue, monitor, or respond to a prior action, event, or communication.
-
D.
subsequentCase
chosen
Indicates that one legal case follows another in time or procedural order, often relying on or referencing the earlier case.
-
E.
followUpRelease
Indicates that one release occurs subsequently as a continuation or update to a previous release.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8278c43e08190824146f4632b89a5 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de62992a188190bc046fbab5a149d6 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 3:51 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fd325c98288190ba035fb5cc5bcf6b |
completed | May 8, 2026, 12:46 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de2a7d586c8190846ff242bbf5ac53 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:52 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:09 a.m.