Triple
T142524
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | House of Lords |
E2883
|
entity |
| Predicate | lostFunction |
P6799
|
FINISHED |
| Object | final court of appeal in the UK |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: final court of appeal in the UK | Statement: [House of Lords, lostFunction, final court of appeal in the UK]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: lostFunction Context triple: [House of Lords, lostFunction, final court of appeal in the UK]
-
A.
lostTo
Indicates that one entity was defeated by another in a competition, conflict, or comparison.
-
B.
lostPowerIn
Indicates that an entity has experienced a loss of electrical or functional power while in or at a specified location or context.
-
C.
lostPowerAgainIn
Indicates that an entity has experienced a repeated loss of power in a specified location or context.
-
D.
fault
Indicates that one entity is responsible or at blame for a problem, error, or undesirable outcome involving another entity or situation.
-
E.
lostPowerInEvent
Indicates that an entity ceased to have power or electricity as a result of a specific event.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2521e35c08190b28e5c9f1e3c9b59 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2580ca15481909fa3e87d804a1b23 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:50 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2565559ac81909e0c4e095a7dfa27 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a2580b00988190868ee24c0289cf70 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:50 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:31 a.m.