Triple
T14221080
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tumut Shire |
E352491
|
entity |
| Predicate | formerLgaOf |
P110170
|
FINISHED |
| Object | New South Wales local government system |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: New South Wales local government system | Statement: [Tumut Shire, formerLgaOf, New South Wales local government system]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: formerLgaOf Context triple: [Tumut Shire, formerLgaOf, New South Wales local government system]
-
A.
formerMunicipalityOf
Indicates that an entity was previously an independent municipality that has since been merged into or replaced by the referenced municipality.
-
B.
formerDistrict
Indicates that one entity previously served as a district of another entity but no longer holds that status.
-
C.
formerNameOfDistrict
Indicates that one district previously had a different official name, which is the value linked by this predicate.
-
D.
hasFormerCounty
Indicates that an entity was previously part of, or administered by, a particular county in the past but no longer is.
-
E.
formerlyInDistrict
chosen
Indicates that an entity was once located in or part of a particular district, but is no longer within that district.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8278a06e481908b5d6af0a8afe737 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de6213801c8190a47705cd890b9ae7 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de05bcd7d48190a4848d9320404aa6 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9:15 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:06 a.m.