Triple
T14209838
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Court of Appeal of Luxembourg |
E352197
|
entity |
| Predicate | appellateInstanceFor |
P46916
|
FINISHED |
| Object | district courts of Luxembourg |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: district courts of Luxembourg | Statement: [Court of Appeal of Luxembourg, appellateInstanceFor, district courts of Luxembourg]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appellateInstanceFor Context triple: [Court of Appeal of Luxembourg, appellateInstanceFor, district courts of Luxembourg]
-
A.
appellateInstance
chosen
Indicates that one legal proceeding or court serves as the appellate (reviewing) instance for another lower-level decision or case.
-
B.
hasAppellateJurisdictionIn
Indicates that one legal authority has the power to review and decide appeals arising from cases within a specified court, region, or jurisdiction.
-
C.
transferredAppellateJurisdictionFrom
Indicates that appellate jurisdiction or authority over a case or legal matter has been moved from one court or body to another.
-
D.
appealsFrom
Indicates that a decision, judgment, or ruling is being challenged and taken to a higher authority or court for review.
-
E.
appealsFor
Indicates that one entity formally requests support, intervention, or a favorable decision from another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8278a06e481908b5d6af0a8afe737 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de61fa8d24819092a8ec5d34c1c799 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de05bcd7d48190a4848d9320404aa6 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9:15 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:05 a.m.