Triple
T14209440
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Newby Bridge Weir |
E352186
|
entity |
| Predicate | waterBodyTypeUpstream |
P113221
|
FINISHED |
| Object | lake |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: lake | Statement: [Newby Bridge Weir, waterBodyTypeUpstream, lake]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: waterBodyTypeUpstream Context triple: [Newby Bridge Weir, waterBodyTypeUpstream, lake]
-
A.
isWatercourseOf
Indicates that a watercourse (such as a river or stream) flows through, belongs to, or is geographically associated with a particular area or feature.
-
B.
hasWatercourseType
Indicates the specific kind or category of watercourse (such as river, stream, or canal) associated with an entity.
-
C.
hasBodyOfWaterDrainedBy
Indicates that a body of water is emptied or its water flow is carried away by a specified draining feature, such as a river, channel, or drainage system.
-
D.
upstreamRiver
Indicates that one river is located or flows in an upstream direction relative to another river within the same watercourse system.
-
E.
watershedType
Indicates the classification or category of a watershed associated with an entity (e.g., by hydrologic, ecological, or management type).
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8278a06e481908b5d6af0a8afe737 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de61fa8d24819092a8ec5d34c1c799 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de05bcd7d48190a4848d9320404aa6 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9:15 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69de239a02e881909b0e2679487e4ab2 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:23 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:05 a.m.