Triple

T1420285
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject 2010 Commonwealth Games E30207 entity
Predicate notableIssues P9106 FINISHED
Object preparations delays LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: preparations delays | Statement: [2010 Commonwealth Games, notableIssues, preparations delays]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableIssues
Context triple: [2010 Commonwealth Games, notableIssues, preparations delays]
  • A. hasNotableIssue chosen
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a significant problem, concern, or defect that is noteworthy or exceptional compared to typical cases.
  • B. knownIssue
    Indicates that the subject has an issue or problem that is already identified, recognized, or documented.
  • C. notableReport
    Indicates that an entity has produced, authored, or is otherwise associated with a report that is considered notable or significant.
  • D. issues
    Indicates that an entity formally produces, releases, or distributes something, such as a document, order, or resource, making it officially available.
  • E. notableChange
    Indicates a significant alteration or shift in the state, condition, or characteristics of an entity or relationship.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a498fb823c8190a67ce4c4837e641a completed March 1, 2026, 7:52 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4c40764ec8190b85de6befcb20dda completed March 1, 2026, 10:56 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4bf060b0081909ba00e6ac093a28b completed March 1, 2026, 10:34 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:59 p.m.