Triple
T14201850
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Anti-sacrilege law |
E351982
|
entity |
| Predicate | offenseDefined |
P26615
|
FINISHED |
| Object | profanation of the consecrated host |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: profanation of the consecrated host | Statement: [Anti-sacrilege law, offenseDefined, profanation of the consecrated host]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: offenseDefined Context triple: [Anti-sacrilege law, offenseDefined, profanation of the consecrated host]
-
A.
offense
Indicates that one entity commits, causes, or is responsible for a violation, wrongdoing, or rule-breaking act against another entity or governing norms.
-
B.
definesOffence
chosen
Indicates that one entity specifies or establishes the nature, elements, or scope of an offence associated with another entity.
-
C.
offenseNicknamed
Indicates that an offensive unit, team, or strategy is commonly referred to by a particular nickname.
-
D.
offensiveCharacteristic
Indicates that one entity possesses a trait, behavior, or quality that is considered insulting, disrespectful, or likely to cause offense to another entity or group.
-
E.
offenceCognizable
Indicates that the offence is of a type for which police may initiate investigation and arrest without requiring prior permission or a warrant from a magistrate.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d827894ac0819097803e57f3227b23 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de61f589a08190b71ad4e69d92ffd0 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de05bcd7d48190a4848d9320404aa6 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9:15 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:05 a.m.