Triple
T14200223
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Constitution of Djibouti |
E351943
|
entity |
| Predicate | amendmentProcedureMayInclude |
P98904
|
FINISHED |
| Object | referendum |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: referendum | Statement: [Constitution of Djibouti, amendmentProcedureMayInclude, referendum]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: amendmentProcedureMayInclude Context triple: [Constitution of Djibouti, amendmentProcedureMayInclude, referendum]
-
A.
amendmentProcedureSometimesRequires
chosen
Indicates that the process for making an amendment may, in some cases, necessitate certain conditions, steps, or approvals.
-
B.
amendmentProcedureDefinedIn
Indicates that the process or rules for making amendments to something are specified or established within a particular source or document.
-
C.
canAmendConstitution
Indicates that an entity has the authority or power to modify or revise a constitution.
-
D.
amendmentMechanism
Indicates the process or rules by which an agreement, document, or system can be formally changed or updated.
-
E.
proposedAmendment
Indicates that one entity has formally suggested a change or addition (an amendment) to another entity, such as a document, law, or agreement.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d827894ac0819097803e57f3227b23 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de61f472548190a1a7edc40526eac3 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de05bcd7d48190a4848d9320404aa6 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9:15 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:04 a.m.