Triple
T14190317
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hall County, Texas |
E351694
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCity |
P316
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Memphis, Texas |
E1085159
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Memphis, Texas | Statement: [Hall County, Texas, hasCity, Memphis, Texas]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Memphis, Texas Context triple: [Hall County, Texas, hasCity, Memphis, Texas]
-
A.
Memphis, Texas
chosen
Memphis, Texas is a small rural city in the Texas Panhandle known historically as a local agricultural and trade center.
-
B.
Missouri City, Texas
Missouri City, Texas is a suburban city in the Houston metropolitan area known for its residential communities and diverse population.
-
C.
Texarkana, Texas
Texarkana, Texas is a border city in northeastern Texas, adjacent to Texarkana, Arkansas, known as a regional transportation and commercial hub.
-
D.
Texarkana, Arkansas
Texarkana, Arkansas is a border city in southwestern Arkansas that forms half of the bi-state Texarkana metropolitan area along the Texas–Arkansas line.
-
E.
Mineola, Texas
Mineola, Texas is a small East Texas city known as a regional hub for railroads, agriculture, and antique shopping.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d827894ac0819097803e57f3227b23 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de61df628c8190ba3f557e2128dce5 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fd280861fc81908c342fc229a526f3 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 12:02 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:03 a.m.