Triple
T14188834
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gordon County |
E351653
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTown |
P847
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Resaca, Georgia |
E912262
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Resaca, Georgia | Statement: [Gordon County, hasTown, Resaca, Georgia]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Resaca, Georgia Context triple: [Gordon County, hasTown, Resaca, Georgia]
-
A.
Resaca, Georgia
chosen
Resaca, Georgia is a small town in Gordon County best known as the site of a major Civil War battle in May 1864 during the Atlanta Campaign.
-
B.
De Soto, Georgia
De Soto, Georgia is a small rural city located in southwestern Georgia in the United States.
-
C.
St. Marys, Georgia
St. Marys, Georgia is a historic coastal town in southeastern Georgia known as a gateway to Cumberland Island and the surrounding marshes and waterways.
-
D.
Tallapoosa, Georgia
Tallapoosa, Georgia is a small city in Haralson County in western Georgia, known for its historic downtown and location near the Alabama state line.
-
E.
Sylvania, Georgia
Sylvania, Georgia is a small city in Screven County known as the county seat and a historic community in eastern Georgia.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d827894ac0819097803e57f3227b23 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de61de509881908967ef5031f2a8d9 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fd280861fc81908c342fc229a526f3 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 12:02 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:03 a.m.