Triple

T14187548
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gosman’s Dock E351616 entity
Predicate waterfrontAccess P31589 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Gosman’s Dock, waterfrontAccess, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: waterfrontAccess
Context triple: [Gosman’s Dock, waterfrontAccess, yes]
  • A. hasWaterfrontAccessTo
    Indicates that one entity is directly adjacent to and can physically access a particular body of water, such as a lake, river, or ocean.
  • B. waterwayAccess chosen
    Indicates that one location has direct access to a waterway (such as a river, canal, or sea route) that can be used for transport, navigation, or related activities.
  • C. hasWaterfrontType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific type or category of waterfront (e.g., oceanfront, lakefront, riverfront).
  • D. isWaterfrontThoroughfare
    Indicates that a thoroughfare (such as a road, street, or path) is located directly along or adjacent to a body of water.
  • E. hasSeaAccess
    Indicates that an entity has direct access to the sea, typically via a coastline, port, or navigable waterway connected to the sea.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8278834a08190b0f1784e58d7b99c completed April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de61de509881908967ef5031f2a8d9 completed April 14, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de05baed64819096590e5618a3a8ed completed April 14, 2026, 9:15 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:03 a.m.