Triple

T14172952
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Martin E351256 entity
Predicate portraysVampiresAs P113104 FINISHED
Object psychologically ambiguous rather than supernatural LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: psychologically ambiguous rather than supernatural | Statement: [Martin, portraysVampiresAs, psychologically ambiguous rather than supernatural]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: portraysVampiresAs
Context triple: [Martin, portraysVampiresAs, psychologically ambiguous rather than supernatural]
  • A. hasVampireCharacter
    Indicates that an entity includes or features at least one character who is a vampire.
  • B. portraysReligionAs
    Indicates that one entity represents, depicts, or characterizes a religion in a particular way.
  • C. oftenDepictedAs
    Indicates that one entity is frequently represented or portrayed in the form, appearance, or symbolism of another entity.
  • D. portraysPersonAs
    Indicates that one entity represents, depicts, or characterizes another person in a particular way or role.
  • E. portraysFictionalized
    Indicates that one entity represents or depicts another entity in a fictionalized or altered manner, rather than as a strictly accurate portrayal.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8278834a08190b0f1784e58d7b99c completed April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de61b5dcbc8190b0cfcce5e6c6d582 completed April 14, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de05baed64819096590e5618a3a8ed completed April 14, 2026, 9:15 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69de239a02e881909b0e2679487e4ab2 completed April 14, 2026, 11:23 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:01 a.m.