Triple

T14169095
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Non Incautus Futuri E351156 entity
Predicate grammaticalCaseOfFuturi P113090 FINISHED
Object genitive LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: genitive | Statement: [Non Incautus Futuri, grammaticalCaseOfFuturi, genitive]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: grammaticalCaseOfFuturi
Context triple: [Non Incautus Futuri, grammaticalCaseOfFuturi, genitive]
  • A. grammaticalForm
    Indicates the specific grammatical structure or morphological form that an expression or word takes in a given linguistic context.
  • B. grammaticalCaseSystem
    Indicates a relationship where a language employs a system of grammatical cases to mark the roles and relationships of nouns and related elements in sentences.
  • C. numberOfGrammaticalCases
    Indicates the relationship that specifies how many distinct grammatical cases a language or linguistic system possesses.
  • D. hasFutureTenseEnding
    Indicates that a verb or expression carries a morphological ending marking future tense.
  • E. grammaticalMood
    Indicates the grammatical mood used in an utterance, specifying the speaker’s attitude toward the action or state (such as indicative, imperative, or subjunctive).
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8278834a08190b0f1784e58d7b99c completed April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de61b472288190b4a271daa54aa6cd completed April 14, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de05b8434c81908c33b1b513463b12 completed April 14, 2026, 9:15 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69de239a02e881909b0e2679487e4ab2 completed April 14, 2026, 11:23 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1 a.m.