Triple

T14169091
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Non Incautus Futuri E351156 entity
Predicate literalMeaningComponent P16024 FINISHED
Object Non = not LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Non = not | Statement: [Non Incautus Futuri, literalMeaningComponent, Non = not]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: literalMeaningComponent
Context triple: [Non Incautus Futuri, literalMeaningComponent, Non = not]
  • A. logicalMeaning
    Indicates that one entity expresses, encodes, or conveys the logical content, implication, or formal meaning of another.
  • B. meaningComponent chosen
    Indicates that one entity represents a semantic or conceptual component contributing to the overall meaning of another entity.
  • C. literalMeaningApproximation
    Indicates that one entity expresses an approximate or rough literal meaning of another entity, rather than an exact or fully precise interpretation.
  • D. stringMeaning
    Indicates that one entity represents the semantic content or interpretation of a given string associated with another entity.
  • E. meaningComponent郎
    Indicates that one entity is a semantic component or constituent part of the overall meaning of another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8278834a08190b0f1784e58d7b99c completed April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de61b472288190b4a271daa54aa6cd completed April 14, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de05b8434c81908c33b1b513463b12 completed April 14, 2026, 9:15 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1 a.m.