Triple
T14164546
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Justin Hammer |
E351035
|
entity |
| Predicate | failsTo |
P113077
|
FINISHED |
| Object | successfully replicate Iron Man armor |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: successfully replicate Iron Man armor | Statement: [Justin Hammer, failsTo, successfully replicate Iron Man armor]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: failsTo Context triple: [Justin Hammer, failsTo, successfully replicate Iron Man armor]
-
A.
failedOn
Indicates that an attempted action or process did not succeed when applied to a specific target, condition, or step.
-
B.
failsWhen
Indicates that a particular action, process, or condition does not succeed under the specified circumstances or triggers.
-
C.
failsInGeneralFor
Indicates that an action, method, or approach does not succeed under typical or broad conditions, rather than only in specific edge cases.
-
D.
failsToConformTo
Indicates that one entity does not meet, match, or comply with the standards, rules, or expectations defined by another entity or specification.
-
E.
failsAtFirst
Indicates that an attempt at an action or task does not succeed on the first try.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8278775fc8190b0802d22ca2f495d |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de61b207cc8190b85b1ff0910b54da |
completed | April 14, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de05b8434c81908c33b1b513463b12 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9:15 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69de239a02e881909b0e2679487e4ab2 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:23 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:59 a.m.