Triple
T14162807
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Courier |
E350990
|
entity |
| Predicate | producer |
P490
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ben Pugh |
E902252
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ben Pugh | Statement: [The Courier, producer, Ben Pugh]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ben Pugh Context triple: [The Courier, producer, Ben Pugh]
-
A.
Ben Pugh
chosen
Ben Pugh is a British film producer and entrepreneur best known as a co-founder of the independent UK company Altitude Film Distribution.
-
B.
Jeff Pugh
Jeff Pugh is a notable individual distinguished enough in his field or public life to be specifically recognized as a bearer of the surname Pugh.
-
C.
Mark Pugh
Mark Pugh is a professional wrestler best known for performing under the ring name Mark Briscoe as part of the acclaimed Briscoe Brothers tag team.
-
D.
Mike Pugh
Mike Pugh is a person whose name is commonly used as an alternative or shortened form of Michael Pugh, leading to ambiguity between the two.
-
E.
Derek Pugh
Derek Pugh is a notable individual recognized for his contributions in his professional field, which have distinguished him among others sharing the surname Pugh.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8278775fc8190b0802d22ca2f495d |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de613a4a2081908fd51bf4b4d82b6c |
completed | April 14, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fd8aa0e98c81908f6b55a04cd72871 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 7:02 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:59 a.m.