Triple
T14154406
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sjoukje |
E350774
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDiminutiveFormLanguage |
P456
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Dutch |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Dutch | Statement: [Sjoukje, hasDiminutiveFormLanguage, Dutch]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDiminutiveFormLanguage Context triple: [Sjoukje, hasDiminutiveFormLanguage, Dutch]
-
A.
hasDiminutive
chosen
Indicates that one entity is a diminutive form or smaller/affectionate variant of another entity.
-
B.
hasLanguageFormOf
Indicates that one entity is a specific linguistic form, expression, or realization of the language used by another entity.
-
C.
hasFeminineFormInSomeLanguages
Indicates that the referenced entity has a distinct feminine grammatical or lexical form in at least one language.
-
D.
hasMinorLanguage
Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a secondary or less prominent language in addition to its primary language.
-
E.
hasFemaleFormOf
Indicates that one entity is the specifically female version or form of another, more general or differently gendered entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8278775fc8190b0802d22ca2f495d |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de6133754881908e1e97db71772deb |
completed | April 14, 2026, 3:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de05b8434c81908c33b1b513463b12 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9:15 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:58 a.m.