Triple
T14124782
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cieszyn Piasts |
E339999
|
entity |
| Predicate | sharesOriginWith |
P3438
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Racibórz Piasts |
E317912
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Racibórz Piasts | Statement: [Cieszyn Piasts, sharesOriginWith, Racibórz Piasts]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Racibórz Piasts Context triple: [Cieszyn Piasts, sharesOriginWith, Racibórz Piasts]
-
A.
Racibórz Piasts
chosen
The Racibórz Piasts were a regional branch of Poland’s medieval Piast dynasty that ruled the Duchy of Racibórz in Silesia.
-
B.
Czersk Piasts
The Czersk Piasts were a regional branch of Poland’s early medieval Piast royal family, associated with the duchy centered around Czersk in Mazovia.
-
C.
Inowrocław Piasts
The Inowrocław Piasts were a regional branch of Poland’s early medieval Piast royal family that ruled the Inowrocław area.
-
D.
Opole Piasts
The Opole Piasts were a regional branch of Poland’s Piast dynasty that ruled the Duchy of Opole and surrounding Silesian territories during the Middle Ages.
-
E.
Cieszyn Piasts
The Cieszyn Piasts were a regional branch of the Polish Piast royal dynasty that ruled the Duchy of Cieszyn in Silesia during the Middle Ages and early modern period.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c6a95b481909e39111e0c1f31ee |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de6096976481909dc79066c5165a50 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 3:43 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fd8aa0e98c81908f6b55a04cd72871 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 7:02 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:22 p.m.