Triple
T14124380
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lüliang |
E339988
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAdministrativeDivision |
P747
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Lan County |
E1129440
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lan County | Statement: [Lüliang, hasAdministrativeDivision, Lan County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Lan County Context triple: [Lüliang, hasAdministrativeDivision, Lan County]
-
A.
Lin County
chosen
Lin County is a county-level administrative region under the jurisdiction of Lüliang City in Shanxi Province, northern China.
-
B.
Logan County
Logan County is a largely rural, coal-mining region in southern West Virginia known for its Appalachian landscape and history.
-
C.
Logan County
Logan County is a largely rural county in northeastern Colorado known for its agricultural economy and small communities such as its county seat, Sterling.
-
D.
Logan County
Logan County is a county in central Oklahoma known for its historic role in the Land Run of 1889 and as the location of the former territorial capital, Guthrie.
-
E.
Lennox County
Lennox County was a former county in Ontario, Canada, that later became part of the amalgamated Lennox and Addington County.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c6a95b481909e39111e0c1f31ee |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de6096976481909dc79066c5165a50 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 3:43 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fe967cea3c81909d9b600501897a41 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:05 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:22 p.m.