Triple
T14122940
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Supreme Court of Denmark |
E339946
|
entity |
| Predicate | typeOfAppealSystem |
P40179
|
FINISHED |
| Object | mainly written procedure with oral hearings |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mainly written procedure with oral hearings | Statement: [Supreme Court of Denmark, typeOfAppealSystem, mainly written procedure with oral hearings]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typeOfAppealSystem Context triple: [Supreme Court of Denmark, typeOfAppealSystem, mainly written procedure with oral hearings]
-
A.
typeOfAppeals
Indicates the specific category or kind of appeals associated with or applied to a given case, decision, or legal action.
-
B.
appealsFrom
Indicates that a decision, judgment, or ruling is being challenged and taken to a higher authority or court for review.
-
C.
levelOfAppeal
Indicates the degree or intensity to which something is attractive, interesting, or desirable to someone or something.
-
D.
typeOfJusticeMechanism
chosen
Indicates the kind or category of justice mechanism that characterizes how justice is pursued or administered in a given context.
-
E.
hearsAppealsIn
Indicates that a judicial body has the authority to review and decide appeals within a specified jurisdiction or court.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c6a95b481909e39111e0c1f31ee |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de6095548881908a9e66adccca92d2 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 3:43 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de05b5e7a08190a16be9ad8b92b80c |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9:15 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:22 p.m.