Triple

T14087003
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject ZFS Intent Log E339022 entity
Predicate notUsedDuring P8096 FINISHED
Object purely asynchronous writes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: purely asynchronous writes | Statement: [ZFS Intent Log, notUsedDuring, purely asynchronous writes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notUsedDuring
Context triple: [ZFS Intent Log, notUsedDuring, purely asynchronous writes]
  • A. notUsedAt
    Indicates that a particular entity is not utilized, applied, or active at a specified location, time, or context.
  • B. notAutomaticallyUsedBy
    Indicates that something is not used by another entity in an automatic or default manner and instead requires explicit action or configuration to be used.
  • C. usedDuring
    Indicates that one entity is employed, applied, or active in the course of another entity’s process, event, or time period.
  • D. notReusedFor
    Indicates that something is not used again for a subsequent purpose, context, or instance.
  • E. notHeldDuring chosen
    Indicates that a specified condition, event, or relationship does not occur or is not in effect throughout a given time interval or temporal context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d81c687b0c819087fd9ed4198403f8 completed April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de5edff1b881909ea56dc2429ef2dd completed April 14, 2026, 3:36 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de05b0e6c88190a819eeba0028981f completed April 14, 2026, 9:15 a.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:21 p.m.