Triple

T14059729
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Heves County E338311 entity
Predicate contains P35 FINISHED
Object Gyöngyös E339338 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gyöngyös | Statement: [Heves County, contains, Gyöngyös]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gyöngyös
Context triple: [Heves County, contains, Gyöngyös]
  • A. Gyöngyös chosen
    Gyöngyös is a historic town in northern Hungary known as a gateway to the Mátra mountain range and its surrounding wine-producing region.
  • B. Nagykőrös
    Nagykőrös is a historic town in central Hungary known for its agricultural traditions and small-town character.
  • C. Kiskőrös
    Kiskőrös is a small town in southern Hungary known as the birthplace of the national poet Sándor Petőfi and for its wine-producing region.
  • D. Hajdúszoboszló
    Hajdúszoboszló is a Hungarian spa town renowned for its thermal baths and large water park, making it a major health and wellness tourism destination.
  • E. Kőszeg
    Kőszeg is a historic Hungarian town near the Austrian border, renowned for its well-preserved medieval architecture and role in defending against Ottoman sieges.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d81c67ba6c819091935650dfb3b895 completed April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de5686f51c81908c33143ecbaae83d completed April 14, 2026, 3 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69fda902c598819083c5373172ed758e completed May 8, 2026, 9:12 a.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:21 p.m.