Triple
T14055280
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kingdom of Denmark |
E338203
|
entity |
| Predicate | currency |
P245
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Danish krone |
E33163
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Danish krone | Statement: [Kingdom of Denmark, currency, Danish krone]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Danish krone Context triple: [Kingdom of Denmark, currency, Danish krone]
-
A.
Danish krone
chosen
The Danish krone is the official currency of Denmark, known for its stable value and close peg to the euro.
-
B.
Danish rigsdaler
The Danish rigsdaler was Denmark’s former currency used until the 19th century, when it was superseded by the Danish krone.
-
C.
Danish Crown
Danish Crown was the historical monarchy of Denmark, which ruled over Danish territories and overseas possessions, including colonial forts such as Fort Kongenstein.
-
D.
Norwegian krone
The Norwegian krone is the official monetary unit of Norway, issued by Norges Bank and commonly traded under the currency code NOK.
-
E.
Swedish–Norwegian krone
The Swedish–Norwegian krone was the common gold-based currency used by the united kingdoms of Sweden and Norway in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c67ba6c819091935650dfb3b895 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de3c8d1aa48190a5055d15d9fa220c |
completed | April 14, 2026, 1:09 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fcb6608cf8819087ed5d890b82650a |
completed | May 7, 2026, 3:57 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:20 p.m.