Triple

T1405163
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject POL E31674 entity
Predicate appliesToTerritoryType P21438 FINISHED
Object sovereign state LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: sovereign state | Statement: [POL, appliesToTerritoryType, sovereign state]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appliesToTerritoryType
Context triple: [POL, appliesToTerritoryType, sovereign state]
  • A. appliesToTerritorialEntity
    Indicates that something (such as a rule, measure, status, or attribute) is valid for, relevant to, or in effect within a specific territorial entity.
  • B. appliesToAdministrativeTerritory
    Indicates that something (such as a rule, measure, or status) is valid for, relevant to, or in force within a specific administrative territory.
  • C. includedTerritoryType
    Indicates that one territory type is contained within, or forms part of, another territory type.
  • D. territoryType chosen
    Indicates the specific kind or classification of a territory associated with an entity (e.g., country, region, zone, or jurisdiction type).
  • E. territoryIncluded
    Indicates that one territory is geographically or administratively contained within another territory.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a49918e1f88190ba610f9dc8114578 completed March 1, 2026, 7:52 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4c3bc55a08190a4dfe13a5378aff3 completed March 1, 2026, 10:54 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4bf030a388190bc82d30b9233e873 completed March 1, 2026, 10:34 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:59 p.m.