Triple
T14049244
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cal Trask |
E338040
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMoralArchetype |
P112629
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Cain figure |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cain figure | Statement: [Cal Trask, hasMoralArchetype, Cain figure]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMoralArchetype Context triple: [Cal Trask, hasMoralArchetype, Cain figure]
-
A.
hasMoralCharacteristic
Indicates that an entity possesses a particular moral quality, trait, or ethical attribute.
-
B.
hasMoralCode
Indicates that an entity adheres to or is guided by a set of moral principles or ethical rules.
-
C.
hasMoralComplexity
Indicates that the relationship or action involves nuanced ethical considerations, conflicting values, or ambiguity in determining what is morally right or wrong.
-
D.
hasMoralPerspective
Indicates that an entity holds or applies a particular moral or ethical viewpoint in evaluating actions, situations, or other entities.
-
E.
hasMoralArc
Indicates that something follows a discernible trajectory of moral development, progress, or decline over time.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c664e48819088cbd8f433aeffe5 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de3c88b5e48190b0f0149102c08992 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 1:09 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de05adef888190b023ab42ef5076b6 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9:15 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69de2398856c81908bed6070e4ca6ab1 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:23 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:20 p.m.