Triple

T14037841
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lomonosov (lunar crater) E337759 entity
Predicate hasMorphologicalState P112583 FINISHED
Object relatively well-preserved LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: relatively well-preserved | Statement: [Lomonosov (lunar crater), hasMorphologicalState, relatively well-preserved]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMorphologicalState
Context triple: [Lomonosov (lunar crater), hasMorphologicalState, relatively well-preserved]
  • A. hasMorphologicalType
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is classified by a particular morphological type or structural form.
  • B. hasVerbalMorphology
    Indicates that one linguistic element exhibits verbal inflectional properties or patterns in relation to another.
  • C. hasNominalMorphology
    Indicates that an entity possesses a system of nominal morphology, such as inflectional or derivational markers on nouns.
  • D. hasMorphologyDistinctFrom
    Indicates that the morphology (form or structure) of one entity is different from that of another entity.
  • E. hasRelativeNaturalState
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a default or inherent condition it naturally tends to be in.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d81c664e48819088cbd8f433aeffe5 completed April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de30e312148190a6be0a3258364e6e completed April 14, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de05ab36b48190920efb1869bdb1fe completed April 14, 2026, 9:15 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69de2398856c81908bed6070e4ca6ab1 completed April 14, 2026, 11:23 a.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:20 p.m.