Triple
T14030389
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | golden ratio |
E337571
|
entity |
| Predicate | isRatioOf |
P39249
|
FINISHED |
| Object | diagonal to side of a regular pentagon |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: diagonal to side of a regular pentagon | Statement: [golden ratio, isRatioOf, diagonal to side of a regular pentagon]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isRatioOf Context triple: [golden ratio, isRatioOf, diagonal to side of a regular pentagon]
-
A.
isProportionalTo
Indicates that one quantity varies in constant ratio to another, so when one changes, the other changes by a fixed multiplicative factor.
-
B.
isProportionalityFactorIn
Indicates that one quantity serves as the proportionality factor (constant of proportionality) in a specified proportional relationship or equation.
-
C.
isQuotientOf
chosen
Indicates that one quantity is the result of dividing another quantity by a specified divisor.
-
D.
radiusRatio
Indicates the proportional relationship between one radius and another, typically expressing how large one is relative to the other.
-
E.
النسب
Indicates a genealogical or familial relationship linking one entity to another through lineage or descent.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c6543a48190bd5ba93d7419e797 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de2fa9f8248190930954d609dee5f1 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 12:14 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de05ab36b48190920efb1869bdb1fe |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9:15 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:20 p.m.