Triple
T14021459
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Flag of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands |
E337340
|
entity |
| Predicate | adoptionAuthority |
P112506
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands High Commissioner |
E246746
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands High Commissioner | Statement: [Flag of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, adoptionAuthority, Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands High Commissioner]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands High Commissioner Context triple: [Flag of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, adoptionAuthority, Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands High Commissioner]
-
A.
Resident Commissioner of the Gilbert and Ellice Islands
The Resident Commissioner of the Gilbert and Ellice Islands was the chief colonial administrative official representing British authority over the Gilbert and Ellice Islands in the central Pacific during the period of British rule.
-
B.
Resident Commissioner of the New Hebrides
The Resident Commissioner of the New Hebrides was the senior colonial administrative post representing one of the two governing powers in the Anglo-French Condominium that jointly ruled the New Hebrides (now Vanuatu) before independence.
-
C.
Office of the High Commissioner of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands
chosen
The Office of the High Commissioner of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands was the administrative authority, under U.S. oversight and United Nations mandate, responsible for governing the former UN Trust Territory in Micronesia.
-
D.
Resident Commissioner of the Pitcairn Islands
The Resident Commissioner of the Pitcairn Islands is the British-appointed official responsible for representing the UK government and overseeing the administration of the remote Pitcairn Island territory.
-
E.
Resident Commissioner of the Solomon Islands
The Resident Commissioner of the Solomon Islands was the chief colonial administrative official representing British authority in the Solomon Islands Protectorate before independence.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: adoptionAuthority Context triple: [Flag of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, adoptionAuthority, Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands High Commissioner]
-
A.
adoption
Indicates the legal or formal act by which one party assumes parental or custodial responsibility for another, typically a child, creating a recognized parent–child relationship.
-
B.
adoptionRole
Indicates the specific role an entity plays within an adoption relationship, such as adopter, adoptee, or intermediary.
-
C.
adoptionLocation
Indicates the place or setting where an adoption event occurs or is formally recorded.
-
D.
adoptionStatus
Indicates the current state or outcome of an adoption relationship or process between entities.
-
E.
adoptedUnder
Indicates that something has been formally accepted, implemented, or brought into effect according to a specified rule, procedure, or authority.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c6543a48190bd5ba93d7419e797 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de2f3c7cd88190b236382058581740 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 12:12 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fbc32f78dc8190bd357d179cbaa5bc |
completed | May 6, 2026, 10:39 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de05a802ac819090604025aae6a4d5 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9:15 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69de239524688190a0f2408c239cfcaa |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:23 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:19 p.m.