Triple
T14021381
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Strategic Trust Territory |
E337339
|
entity |
| Predicate | trusteeshipAgreementNumber |
P112505
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Trusteeship Agreement for the Former Japanese Mandated Islands |
E246745
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Trusteeship Agreement for the Former Japanese Mandated Islands | Statement: [Strategic Trust Territory, trusteeshipAgreementNumber, Trusteeship Agreement for the Former Japanese Mandated Islands]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Trusteeship Agreement for the Former Japanese Mandated Islands Context triple: [Strategic Trust Territory, trusteeshipAgreementNumber, Trusteeship Agreement for the Former Japanese Mandated Islands]
-
A.
United Nations Trusteeship Agreement for the Former Japanese Mandated Islands
chosen
The United Nations Trusteeship Agreement for the Former Japanese Mandated Islands was the international legal instrument that established and governed the post–World War II UN trusteeship system over Japan’s former Pacific island territories, primarily administered by the United States.
-
B.
Okinawa Reversion Agreement
The Okinawa Reversion Agreement was a 1971 treaty between the United States and Japan that returned administrative control of Okinawa to Japan, formally ending decades of post–World War II U.S. military governance there.
-
C.
United States Civil Administration of the Ryukyu Islands
The United States Civil Administration of the Ryukyu Islands was the U.S. military government that administered Okinawa and surrounding Ryukyu Islands after World War II until their reversion to Japan in 1972.
-
D.
Japan–Korea Annexation Treaty
The Japan–Korea Annexation Treaty was the 1910 agreement through which the Japanese Empire formally annexed Korea, initiating a period of colonial rule under a Japanese governor-general.
-
E.
Treaty of San Francisco
The Treaty of San Francisco was the 1951 peace treaty between Japan and most Allied nations that officially ended World War II hostilities with Japan and restored its sovereignty.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: trusteeshipAgreementNumber Context triple: [Strategic Trust Territory, trusteeshipAgreementNumber, Trusteeship Agreement for the Former Japanese Mandated Islands]
-
A.
treatyNumber
Indicates the specific identifying number assigned to a treaty within a legal or diplomatic framework.
-
B.
treatyPartNumber
Indicates the specific part or section number within a treaty to which something (e.g., a provision, reference, or citation) is related.
-
C.
tribunalNumber
Indicates the identifying number assigned to a specific tribunal within a legal or administrative system.
-
D.
involvedAgreement
Indicates that an entity participates in, is a party to, or is otherwise associated with a specific agreement or contract.
-
E.
basedOnAgreementWith
Indicates that something exists, is done, or is determined on the basis of a prior agreement or accord between the involved parties.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c6543a48190bd5ba93d7419e797 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de2f3c7cd88190b236382058581740 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 12:12 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fbc32f78dc8190bd357d179cbaa5bc |
completed | May 6, 2026, 10:39 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de05a802ac819090604025aae6a4d5 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9:15 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69de239524688190a0f2408c239cfcaa |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:23 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:19 p.m.