Triple

T14018169
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Delta blues region E337253 entity
Predicate musicStyleCharacteristics P45796 FINISHED
Object rhythmic complexity LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: rhythmic complexity | Statement: [Delta blues region, musicStyleCharacteristics, rhythmic complexity]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: musicStyleCharacteristics
Context triple: [Delta blues region, musicStyleCharacteristics, rhythmic complexity]
  • A. hasMusicalStyleCharacteristic chosen
    Indicates that something possesses or exhibits a particular musical style as a defining characteristic.
  • B. styleOfMusic
    Indicates the musical genre or stylistic category that characterizes a piece of music, artist, or performance.
  • C. musicalAttribute
    Indicates a relationship where a musical work, performance, or element is characterized by a specific musical property or quality (such as tempo, key, style, or mood).
  • D. notableSongCharacteristic
    Indicates that a song is distinguished by a particular notable feature or quality, such as style, structure, or performance trait.
  • E. hasMusicalStyleSimilarTo
    Indicates that two entities share a comparable or closely related musical style or sound.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d81c6543a48190bd5ba93d7419e797 completed April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de2f3b5b088190a58715779d2c46a6 completed April 14, 2026, 12:12 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de05a802ac819090604025aae6a4d5 completed April 14, 2026, 9:15 a.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:19 p.m.