Triple
T14017423
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Australia–China relations |
E337238
|
entity |
| Predicate | diplomaticRecognitionEstablished |
P78848
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1972 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1972 | Statement: [Australia–China relations, diplomaticRecognitionEstablished, 1972]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: diplomaticRecognitionEstablished Context triple: [Australia–China relations, diplomaticRecognitionEstablished, 1972]
-
A.
politicalRecognition
Indicates that one entity formally acknowledges the political status, authority, or legitimacy of another entity.
-
B.
formalDiplomaticRelationsEstablished
chosen
Indicates that official diplomatic ties have been formally initiated and recognized between two political entities.
-
C.
receivesDiplomaticAccreditationFrom
Indicates that an entity is formally recognized and accepted in an official diplomatic capacity by another entity that grants the accreditation.
-
D.
independenceRecognized
Indicates that one entity formally acknowledges another entity’s status as independent and self-governing.
-
E.
diplomaticRelationBetween
Indicates the existence of a formal diplomatic relationship or ties between two political entities or states.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c6543a48190bd5ba93d7419e797 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de2f3b5b088190a58715779d2c46a6 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 12:12 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de05a802ac819090604025aae6a4d5 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9:15 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:19 p.m.