Triple
T14013491
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dick Sisler |
E337145
|
entity |
| Predicate | helpedTeamTo |
P112441
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1950 National League pennant |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1950 National League pennant | Statement: [Dick Sisler, helpedTeamTo, 1950 National League pennant]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: helpedTeamTo Context triple: [Dick Sisler, helpedTeamTo, 1950 National League pennant]
-
A.
helpedTransformTeam
Indicates that one entity played a significant role in changing or improving the performance, dynamics, or structure of a team.
-
B.
managedTeamTo
Indicates that one entity had managerial responsibility or oversight over the specified team.
-
C.
managedTeam
Indicates that one entity had responsibility for directing, supervising, and coordinating the work of another group or team.
-
D.
managedTeamFrom
Indicates that one entity led, directed, or supervised a team originating from or based in another specified entity.
-
E.
teamUpWith
Indicates forming a cooperative partnership or alliance with another entity to work together toward a shared goal.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c645c5c8190b1fd16a285a1b78a |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de2f37d11481909159bdb9e1e8d38e |
completed | April 14, 2026, 12:12 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de05a802ac819090604025aae6a4d5 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9:15 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69de239524688190a0f2408c239cfcaa |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:23 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:19 p.m.