Triple

T14000804
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Principality of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen E336814 entity
Predicate annexationEffective P43098 FINISHED
Object 1850 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1850 | Statement: [Principality of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen, annexationEffective, 1850]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: annexationEffective
Context triple: [Principality of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen, annexationEffective, 1850]
  • A. annexationInstrument
    Indicates the legal or formal instrument (such as a treaty, decree, or law) by which one entity annexes or incorporates another.
  • B. annexationPolicy
    Indicates a policy or practice of formally incorporating one territory into the jurisdiction or sovereignty of another.
  • C. annexationBasis
    Indicates the legal, political, or historical grounds used to justify the annexation of one territory by another.
  • D. annex
    Indicates the act of formally incorporating one entity, typically a territory, into the domain or control of another.
  • E. annexedDuring chosen
    Indicates that one entity was formally incorporated into and brought under the control of another entity during a specified time period.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d81c645c5c8190b1fd16a285a1b78a completed April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de2eb81b208190a961e49a02fa4140 completed April 14, 2026, 12:10 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69dd465dfbc4819090d8c61fd572d35f completed April 13, 2026, 7:39 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:19 p.m.