Triple

T1397786
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory E30705 entity
Predicate hearsAppealsAs P14824 FINISHED
Object full court in its appellate jurisdiction LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: full court in its appellate jurisdiction | Statement: [Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory, hearsAppealsAs, full court in its appellate jurisdiction]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hearsAppealsAs
Context triple: [Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory, hearsAppealsAs, full court in its appellate jurisdiction]
  • A. hearsAppealsBy
    Indicates that one party has the authority or role to review and decide on appeals submitted by another party.
  • B. hearsCasesUnder
    Indicates that a judicial body or authority has the responsibility and power to adjudicate legal cases falling within a specified jurisdiction, category, or scope.
  • C. hasAppellateJurisdictionIn chosen
    Indicates that one legal authority has the power to review and decide appeals arising from cases within a specified court, region, or jurisdiction.
  • D. hearsCasesAgainst
    Indicates that one party (typically a judicial body or official) formally listens to and considers legal cases brought against another party.
  • E. appealsFrom
    Indicates that a decision, judgment, or ruling is being challenged and taken to a higher authority or court for review.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a498fd4e408190bd73eca30ea9754c completed March 1, 2026, 7:52 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4c382b6588190833c39ac84fb6139 completed March 1, 2026, 10:53 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4bf017f8081908572121560ec621f completed March 1, 2026, 10:34 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:59 p.m.