Triple
T1397767
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory |
E30705
|
entity |
| Predicate | canHearAppealsTo |
P17875
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Federal Court of Australia
The Federal Court of Australia is a superior national court that primarily deals with civil disputes governed by federal law and reviews decisions of federal tribunals and lower courts across Australia.
|
E159104
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (5 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Federal Court of Australia | Statement: [Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory, canHearAppealsTo, Federal Court of Australia]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Federal Court of Australia Context triple: [Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory, canHearAppealsTo, Federal Court of Australia]
-
A.
High Court of Australia
The High Court of Australia is the nation’s supreme judicial authority, serving as the final court of appeal and the ultimate interpreter of the Australian Constitution.
-
B.
Supreme Court of Tasmania
The Supreme Court of Tasmania is the highest court in the Australian state of Tasmania, handling serious criminal and civil cases as well as appeals.
-
C.
Federal Court of Canada
The Federal Court of Canada is a national superior court that primarily hears and decides legal disputes involving federal law, federal government agencies, and matters such as immigration, intellectual property, and maritime law.
-
D.
Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory
The Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory is the highest court in the ACT, handling serious criminal and civil cases and serving as the territory’s principal court of record.
-
E.
Federal Court of Appeal
The Federal Court of Appeal is a Canadian appellate court that primarily hears appeals from the Federal Court and certain federal tribunals on matters of federal law.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Federal Court of Australia Triple: [Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory, canHearAppealsTo, Federal Court of Australia]
Generated description
The Federal Court of Australia is a superior national court that primarily deals with civil disputes governed by federal law and reviews decisions of federal tribunals and lower courts across Australia.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Federal Court of Australia Target entity description: The Federal Court of Australia is a superior national court that primarily deals with civil disputes governed by federal law and reviews decisions of federal tribunals and lower courts across Australia.
-
A.
High Court of Australia
The High Court of Australia is the nation’s supreme judicial authority, serving as the final court of appeal and the ultimate interpreter of the Australian Constitution.
-
B.
Supreme Court of Tasmania
The Supreme Court of Tasmania is the highest court in the Australian state of Tasmania, handling serious criminal and civil cases as well as appeals.
-
C.
Federal Court of Canada
The Federal Court of Canada is a national superior court that primarily hears and decides legal disputes involving federal law, federal government agencies, and matters such as immigration, intellectual property, and maritime law.
-
D.
Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory
The Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory is the highest court in the ACT, handling serious criminal and civil cases and serving as the territory’s principal court of record.
-
E.
Federal Court of Appeal
The Federal Court of Appeal is a Canadian appellate court that primarily hears appeals from the Federal Court and certain federal tribunals on matters of federal law.
- F. None of above. chosen
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canHearAppealsTo Context triple: [Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory, canHearAppealsTo, Federal Court of Australia]
-
A.
canHear
Indicates that one entity is able to perceive sounds produced by another entity.
-
B.
hearsAppealsBy
Indicates that one party has the authority or role to review and decide on appeals submitted by another party.
-
C.
mayHear
Indicates that one entity is permitted or able to hear sounds, speech, or audio produced by another entity.
-
D.
canBeAppealedTo
chosen
Indicates that a decision, action, or authority is subject to being challenged or reviewed by a higher or alternative authority through an appeal process.
-
E.
hears
Indicates that one entity perceives or detects sounds produced by another entity or source.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (6 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a498fd4e408190bd73eca30ea9754c |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4c382b6588190833c39ac84fb6139 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:53 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69acde353b148190b9122f1d6d80fbd4 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:25 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69acdea5150c8190ab248df8852bcde6 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:27 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69acdefd76708190be68b157e83cfd87 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:29 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4bf017f8081908572121560ec621f |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:34 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:59 p.m.