Triple
T13969974
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Villanelle |
E336031
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipTypeWithEvePolastri |
P112000
|
FINISHED |
| Object | mutual obsession |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mutual obsession | Statement: [Villanelle, relationshipTypeWithEvePolastri, mutual obsession]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipTypeWithEvePolastri Context triple: [Villanelle, relationshipTypeWithEvePolastri, mutual obsession]
-
A.
relationshipTypeWithLizzieEustace
Indicates the specific nature or category of relationship that an entity has with Lizzie Eustace.
-
B.
relationshipTypeWith Francesca Johnson
Indicates the specific nature or category of the relationship that an entity has with Francesca Johnson.
-
C.
relationshipType
Indicates the specific kind of relationship that exists between two or more entities.
-
D.
relationshipToEveHarrington
Indicates the nature or role of one entity’s connection or association to Eve Harrington.
-
E.
relationshipTypeWithEunice
Indicates the specific nature or category of the relationship that an entity has with Eunice.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c61f3508190aaf2ca0dc0002c59 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de2e8daeac8190aadd4b3b60222482 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 12:09 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69dd465a21408190b912a42c50ffa0d9 |
completed | April 13, 2026, 7:39 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69de01ed2098819088ec45069f6f2609 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 8:59 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:18 p.m.