Triple

T13964424
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Waray of Samar E335884 entity
Predicate hasDialectalVariationWith P18451 FINISHED
Object Waray varieties of Leyte LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Waray varieties of Leyte | Statement: [Waray of Samar, hasDialectalVariationWith, Waray varieties of Leyte]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDialectalVariationWith
Context triple: [Waray of Samar, hasDialectalVariationWith, Waray varieties of Leyte]
  • A. hasDialectContinuumWith chosen
    Indicates that two languages or dialects are part of a continuous chain of mutually intelligible varieties, without a clear boundary separating them.
  • B. hasLinguisticVariety
    Indicates that one entity possesses or exhibits a particular linguistic variety in relation to another entity or context.
  • C. hasRegionalVariationsIn
    Indicates that something exhibits different forms, versions, or characteristics depending on the geographic region.
  • D. hasColloquialVariety
    Indicates that one linguistic form, expression, or variety is an informal, colloquial counterpart or version of another.
  • E. linguisticVariant
    Indicates that one linguistic form is an alternative version or expression of another within the same or closely related language context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d81c61f3508190aaf2ca0dc0002c59 completed April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de2e7e24f08190ba939a8044860033 completed April 14, 2026, 12:09 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69dd465a21408190b912a42c50ffa0d9 completed April 13, 2026, 7:39 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:18 p.m.