Triple

T13962989
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tristano muore E335843 entity
Predicate hasTypeOfNarrator P32398 FINISHED
Object dying narrator LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: dying narrator | Statement: [Tristano muore, hasTypeOfNarrator, dying narrator]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTypeOfNarrator
Context triple: [Tristano muore, hasTypeOfNarrator, dying narrator]
  • A. narratorType chosen
    Indicates the narrative perspective or role from which a story or account is being told.
  • B. narratorOf
    Indicates that one entity serves as the narrator or storytelling voice for another entity, such as a text, story, or media work.
  • C. fictionalNarrator
    Indicates that one entity serves as the narrator or storytelling voice within a fictional work that features the other entity.
  • D. narratorRole
    Indicates that one entity serves as the narrator of another entity (such as a story, text, or media work), specifying the narrative role or function it performs.
  • E. hasNarrativeRole
    Indicates that an entity participates in a narrative with a specific functional role (e.g., protagonist, antagonist, narrator) relative to the story.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d81c61f3508190aaf2ca0dc0002c59 completed April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de2e7c73d48190b8e02971b5a8ed5f completed April 14, 2026, 12:09 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de05a3ccf88190b45c742db483fa08 completed April 14, 2026, 9:15 a.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:18 p.m.