Triple

T13961034
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 E335790 entity
Predicate penaltyMechanism P112422 FINISHED
Object sequestration LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: sequestration | Statement: [Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, penaltyMechanism, sequestration]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: penaltyMechanism
Context triple: [Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, penaltyMechanism, sequestration]
  • A. penaltyRules
    Indicates the rules or conditions under which penalties are defined, applied, or enforced in a given context.
  • B. movementPenaltyMechanic
    Indicates a game or system mechanic that imposes a penalty or disadvantage on an entity’s movement under certain conditions.
  • C. penaltyProvision
    Indicates that a rule, contract, or law includes a clause specifying a punishment or sanction for non-compliance or violation.
  • D. defaultPenalty
    Indicates that a standard or automatically applied penalty is imposed in the absence of a specific or overridden penalty.
  • E. supportsPenalty
    Indicates that one entity endorses, approves of, or is in favor of a particular penalty being applied to another entity or situation.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d81c61f3508190aaf2ca0dc0002c59 completed April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de2e7b2f908190aa32f22298964746 completed April 14, 2026, 12:09 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de05a3ccf88190b45c742db483fa08 completed April 14, 2026, 9:15 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69de239524688190a0f2408c239cfcaa completed April 14, 2026, 11:23 a.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:17 p.m.