Triple
T13942066
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Miss |
E335280
|
entity |
| Predicate | typicalMaritalStatus |
P20884
|
FINISHED |
| Object | unmarried |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: unmarried | Statement: [Miss, typicalMaritalStatus, unmarried]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalMaritalStatus Context triple: [Miss, typicalMaritalStatus, unmarried]
-
A.
marital status
chosen
Indicates the legal or social state of a person’s marriage-related relationship, such as being single, married, divorced, or widowed.
-
B.
spouseStatus
Indicates the marital relationship status between two individuals, such as whether they are currently spouses, formerly spouses, or not married to each other.
-
C.
hasCivilStatus
Indicates the civil or marital status that applies to a person or entity (e.g., single, married, divorced).
-
D.
marriageType
Indicates the specific legal or social category of a marriage relationship that exists between two spouses.
-
E.
parentsMarriageStatus
Indicates the marital status relationship between an individual’s parents (e.g., married, divorced, separated, never married).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c6081b88190b53e317c3370c8fe |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de2cf6e29881908ddb8efca9a456a3 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 12:03 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de05a3ccf88190b45c742db483fa08 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9:15 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:17 p.m.