Triple
T13915502
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Afshar (Afsharid-related) lineage |
E334609
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableCampaignsUnder |
P4656
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Nader Shah's Indian campaign
Nader Shah's Indian campaign was an 18th-century Persian military invasion of the Mughal Empire that culminated in the sack of Delhi and the massive transfer of wealth, including the Peacock Throne and Koh-i-Noor diamond, to Iran.
|
E1070786
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (5 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Nader Shah's Indian campaign | Statement: [Afshar (Afsharid-related) lineage, notableCampaignsUnder, Nader Shah's Indian campaign]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Nader Shah's Indian campaign Context triple: [Afshar (Afsharid-related) lineage, notableCampaignsUnder, Nader Shah's Indian campaign]
-
A.
Mughal conquest of Kandahar
The Mughal conquest of Kandahar was a key 17th-century campaign in which the Mughal Empire seized the strategic Afghan city of Kandahar from Safavid Persia, intensifying the broader Mughal–Safavid rivalry.
-
B.
Mughal conquest of Sindh
The Mughal conquest of Sindh was the late 16th-century campaign in which the Mughal Empire defeated the local rulers and incorporated the Sindh region into its expanding dominions in South Asia.
-
C.
British conquest of Sindh
The British conquest of Sindh was the 19th-century campaign in which the British East India Company defeated local rulers and annexed the Sindh region (in present-day Pakistan) into its Indian territories.
-
D.
Mughal conquest of Golconda
The Mughal conquest of Golconda was the 1687 campaign in which Emperor Aurangzeb’s forces besieged and annexed the wealthy Golconda Sultanate, bringing much of the Deccan under direct Mughal control.
-
E.
Hotak invasion of Iran
The Hotak invasion of Iran was an early 18th-century Afghan campaign that toppled the Safavid dynasty and briefly established Hotak rule over much of Persia.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Nader Shah's Indian campaign Triple: [Afshar (Afsharid-related) lineage, notableCampaignsUnder, Nader Shah's Indian campaign]
Generated description
Nader Shah's Indian campaign was an 18th-century Persian military invasion of the Mughal Empire that culminated in the sack of Delhi and the massive transfer of wealth, including the Peacock Throne and Koh-i-Noor diamond, to Iran.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Nader Shah's Indian campaign Target entity description: Nader Shah's Indian campaign was an 18th-century Persian military invasion of the Mughal Empire that culminated in the sack of Delhi and the massive transfer of wealth, including the Peacock Throne and Koh-i-Noor diamond, to Iran.
-
A.
Mughal conquest of Kandahar
The Mughal conquest of Kandahar was a key 17th-century campaign in which the Mughal Empire seized the strategic Afghan city of Kandahar from Safavid Persia, intensifying the broader Mughal–Safavid rivalry.
-
B.
Mughal conquest of Sindh
The Mughal conquest of Sindh was the late 16th-century campaign in which the Mughal Empire defeated the local rulers and incorporated the Sindh region into its expanding dominions in South Asia.
-
C.
British conquest of Sindh
The British conquest of Sindh was the 19th-century campaign in which the British East India Company defeated local rulers and annexed the Sindh region (in present-day Pakistan) into its Indian territories.
-
D.
Mughal conquest of Golconda
The Mughal conquest of Golconda was the 1687 campaign in which Emperor Aurangzeb’s forces besieged and annexed the wealthy Golconda Sultanate, bringing much of the Deccan under direct Mughal control.
-
E.
Hotak invasion of Iran
The Hotak invasion of Iran was an early 18th-century Afghan campaign that toppled the Safavid dynasty and briefly established Hotak rule over much of Persia.
- F. None of above. chosen
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableCampaignsUnder Context triple: [Afshar (Afsharid-related) lineage, notableCampaignsUnder, Nader Shah's Indian campaign]
-
A.
notableCampaign
chosen
Indicates that an entity is prominently associated with a particular campaign, such as by leading, featuring in, or being a key focus of that campaign.
-
B.
notableCampaignDirection
Indicates that an entity played a significant role in directing or guiding a particular campaign.
-
C.
conductedCampaignsIn
Indicates that an entity organized or carried out campaigns within a specified location or region.
-
D.
conductedCampaignsAgainst
Indicates that an entity organized and carried out systematic efforts or operations targeting another entity in opposition or conflict.
-
E.
continuedCampaignsOf
Indicates that one campaign is a direct continuation or follow-up of another campaign, extending its efforts or objectives over time.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (6 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c5eaa9c819083b1ff8689179565 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de27260ae08190be45b4b15898e365 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:38 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f7ce783d808190b0e0ec89591af51d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:38 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69f7cf95e5a08190b264e543877d2852 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:43 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69fb5504702081908a1492f1a8e24434 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 2:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de059e4ba881908554f72e889719fa |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9:15 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:16 p.m.