Triple

T13902938
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mancunian E334273 entity
Predicate hasStereotypeOf P91566 FINISHED
Object direct manner of speaking LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: direct manner of speaking | Statement: [Mancunian, hasStereotypeOf, direct manner of speaking]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasStereotypeOf
Context triple: [Mancunian, hasStereotypeOf, direct manner of speaking]
  • A. hasStereotypeAssociation chosen
    Indicates that one entity is associated with another through a stereotype, implying a generalized or oversimplified characterization rather than an individually grounded attribute.
  • B. hasStratotype
    Indicates that one entity serves as the designated standard or reference example (stratotype) for defining the stratigraphic characteristics of another entity.
  • C. hasArchetype
    Indicates that one entity serves as the original model, pattern, or prototype upon which another entity is based or conceptually derived.
  • D. hasStructureType
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is classified by a specific structural type or configuration.
  • E. hasContainmentType
    Indicates the specific way in which one entity is contained within or enclosed by another.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d81c5eaa9c819083b1ff8689179565 completed April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de25db1e308190aaed6a21e443cc44 completed April 14, 2026, 11:32 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69dd464b1ab48190ae50bfc902bf6ef7 completed April 13, 2026, 7:38 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:16 p.m.