Triple
T13901688
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Arguments before the Geneva Tribunal on the Alabama Claims |
E334238
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | collection of legal arguments |
C23395
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: collection of legal arguments Context triple: [Arguments before the Geneva Tribunal on the Alabama Claims, instanceOf, collection of legal arguments]
-
A.
legal argument
chosen
A legal argument is a structured, logical presentation of facts, laws, and reasoning intended to persuade a legal decision-maker toward a particular interpretation or outcome in a dispute.
-
B.
legal analysis
A legal analysis is a structured evaluation of laws, regulations, and relevant facts to interpret their meaning, assess their application to a specific situation, and predict likely legal outcomes.
-
C.
legal toolset
A legal toolset is a collection of methods, resources, and technologies designed to help individuals and organizations understand, manage, and apply legal rules and processes effectively.
-
D.
set of legal provisions
A set of legal provisions is an organized collection of formally enacted rules or clauses that together define rights, obligations, procedures, and consequences within a specific legal framework or context.
-
E.
law library
A law library is a specialized collection of legal resources, including statutes, case law, regulations, and secondary sources, organized to support legal research and practice.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c5eaa9c819083b1ff8689179565 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:15 p.m.