Triple

T1388888
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cape of Good Hope E29908 entity
Predicate notableMisconception P28207 FINISHED
Object often mistakenly thought to be southernmost point of Africa LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: often mistakenly thought to be southernmost point of Africa | Statement: [Cape of Good Hope, notableMisconception, often mistakenly thought to be southernmost point of Africa]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableMisconception
Context triple: [Cape of Good Hope, notableMisconception, often mistakenly thought to be southernmost point of Africa]
  • A. notableFact
    Indicates that there exists a particularly significant or noteworthy fact or piece of information associated with the subject.
  • B. notableFor
    Indicates that an entity is especially recognized or distinguished for a particular quality, achievement, characteristic, or role.
  • C. notableMistress
    Indicates that a person is notably recognized as the mistress (non-marital romantic partner) of another person.
  • D. notableResolution
    Indicates that an entity is distinguished or recognized for having a particularly important, impactful, or well-known resolution or decision.
  • E. challengedConcept
    Indicates that one entity has questioned, disputed, or called into doubt the validity, accuracy, or applicability of a particular concept.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a498dc92f8819094a1108f8ac90f43 completed March 1, 2026, 7:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4c35ce48c81909aaad7dfa2df63fa completed March 1, 2026, 10:53 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4beffcf808190ab4cd0271257ce63 completed March 1, 2026, 10:34 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4c2f16ae081908c92792253f3eb4b completed March 1, 2026, 10:51 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:59 p.m.