Triple

T13879772
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Marga E333681 entity
Predicate relatedName P3889 FINISHED
Object Margareta E113357 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Margareta | Statement: [Marga, relatedName, Margareta]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Margareta
Context triple: [Marga, relatedName, Margareta]
  • A. Margareta chosen
    Margareta is a feminine given name used in various European languages, closely related to and derived from the name Margaret.
  • B. Maddalene
    Maddalene is a feminine given name, typically considered a variant of Maddalena or Magdalene, with roots in Christian and European naming traditions.
  • C. Anna Margareta
    Anna Margareta Tunder was a historical figure known primarily as the namesake and likely relative of the German Baroque composer and organist Franz Tunder.
  • D. Hjördis
    Hjördis is a Scandinavian feminine given name, most notably borne by Swedish model and actress Hjördis Genberg.
  • E. Agneta
    Agneta is a feminine given name, primarily used in Scandinavian countries, that is a variant of the name Agnes.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d81c5dd2d48190b7a5fc1e009de936 completed April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de0be71d388190909290cad2c6daf5 completed April 14, 2026, 9:41 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69fbac824a60819090894504dbb41de9 completed May 6, 2026, 9:02 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:15 p.m.