Triple
T13871337
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 2011–12 Western Conference champions |
E333455
|
entity |
| Predicate | secondRoundSeriesResult |
P112200
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 4–1 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 4–1 | Statement: [2011–12 Western Conference champions, secondRoundSeriesResult, 4–1]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: secondRoundSeriesResult Context triple: [2011–12 Western Conference champions, secondRoundSeriesResult, 4–1]
-
A.
secondRoundWinner
Indicates that the subject is the winner of the second round in a multi-round competition, contest, or process.
-
B.
semifinalResult
Indicates the outcome or score of a semifinal-stage contest or match between competitors.
-
C.
secondRoundRunnerUp
Indicates that an entity finished in third place (runner-up to the runner-up) in the second round of a competition or selection process.
-
D.
secondRoundDate
Indicates the date on which the second round of an event, process, or sequence is scheduled or occurs.
-
E.
secondRoundEndDate
Indicates the date on which the second round of an event, process, or activity concludes.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c5ced9c8190b0e9bcc6effe5959 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de23a101488190bd790b28033d38b9 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:23 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de05972f3881909977b4c843984f88 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9:15 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69de239524688190a0f2408c239cfcaa |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:23 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:14 p.m.