Triple
T13868201
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Common Sense |
E333382
|
entity |
| Predicate | laterEditions |
P112178
|
FINISHED |
| Object | included responses to critics |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: included responses to critics | Statement: [Common Sense, laterEditions, included responses to critics]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: laterEditions Context triple: [Common Sense, laterEditions, included responses to critics]
-
A.
laterEditionsScript
Indicates that the script is used in later editions or versions of a work, relative to an earlier script or edition.
-
B.
laterRepublishedWith
Indicates that an existing work was republished at a later time in a modified or updated form specified by the related entity.
-
C.
laterEditionParatext
Indicates that the paratext is taken from or associated with a later edition of the work than the primary text or base edition under consideration.
-
D.
modernEditionBy
Indicates that one entity is a modern edition or updated version that has been prepared, edited, or published by another entity.
-
E.
coAuthorOfLaterEditions
Indicates that one entity collaborated as a co-author on later editions of a work originally authored or published earlier.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c5ced9c8190b0e9bcc6effe5959 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de23a101488190bd790b28033d38b9 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:23 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de05972f3881909977b4c843984f88 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9:15 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69de239524688190a0f2408c239cfcaa |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:23 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:14 p.m.