Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford | Statement: [Anonymous (2011 film), portrays, Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford]

Target entity: Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford
Context triple: [Anonymous (2011 film), portrays, Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford]

• A. Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford chosen
  Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford, was an Elizabethan courtier, poet, and patron of the arts who is best known today as a leading alternative candidate proposed by some scholars as the true author of William Shakespeare’s works.
• B. Henry Wriothesley, 3rd Earl of Southampton
  Henry Wriothesley, 3rd Earl of Southampton was an English nobleman, patron of William Shakespeare, and prominent supporter of the Earl of Essex who played a notable role in the politics of Elizabethan and early Stuart England.
• C. John de Vere, 13th Earl of Oxford
  John de Vere, 13th Earl of Oxford, was a prominent Lancastrian noble and military commander during the Wars of the Roses who played a key role in several major battles and later became a loyal supporter of Henry VII.
• D. Philip Sidney, 3rd Earl of Leicester
  Philip Sidney, 3rd Earl of Leicester, was an English nobleman and statesman of the late 17th and early 18th centuries who held prominent political and administrative offices in the service of the Crown.
• E. Edward Harley, 2nd Earl of Oxford and Earl Mortimer
  Edward Harley, 2nd Earl of Oxford and Earl Mortimer, was an 18th-century British peer, politician, and notable patron and collector of books and manuscripts whose library became foundational to the British Museum.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.